Tuesday, March 17, 2009

I'm Over Here

The little chick and I have been playing a lot of hide and seek lately. It's been an interesting experience for me... I don't remember playing a lot of hide and seek, but I'm pretty sure I don't remember ever playing it like this.

She is pretty good at the counting, but not great at closing her eyes... not a surprise for a three year-old. She has a habit of hiding in the exact place that she just found me. But I think that part of it is that she doesn't care much about the surprise aspect of it, because pretty frequently when it's my turn to hide she likes to tell me where I should be hiding.

Of course, I don't worry too much about that. And she always finds me, eventually.

She does get bored sometimes, and can kind of forget that I'm hiding somewhere as she finds a book or a toy that takes a little higher priority. That's pretty par for the course, too, with a little chick.

The best part, though, is the goal of the game for her. For most people, it's to find whoever is hiding, or to stay hiding. For her, it's all about the hugs at the end.

So she's not very discreet when she's hidden, but I play the game: I walk around the house, asking where she is, looking into drawers or under cushions, while she "hides". She'll start in the closet, and poke her head out to see if I've spotted her. When I walk by, she'll jump back in, then put her head out again and yell "Daddy, I'm over here!!!". Then she'll be back in the closet for a minute, then out again completely, as I routinely fail completely to find her, even with her hint. Finally, she'll be unable to hold it in any longer, and will jump out, hop around, and call me until I manage to find my way back to her to give her a giant hug.

So the hiding part is a bit sketchy. The seeking is not much better.

But the hugs are pretty great.

5 comments:

Kat(i)e said...

UTTER cuteness.

Though on the flipside I've just realised that I think, perhaps, the name "little chick" might well derive from her being a small female, as opposed to some kind of darling farmyard critter, which kinda makes me a little bit angry over the belittling nature of that word towards women... whilst at the very same time enjoying it tremendously for its tongue-in-cheek value. Hmmmmmmmmm. Which is it DD?

P.S. Happy Birthday!

Darryl said...

Well, it is certainly more closely linked to the fact that she's a small female (which she is) rather than a fluffy little fowl, though the big yellow mop of hair doesn't hurt.

As belittling... well, I won't try to defend how anyone else uses it, but when I say it about her, it's nothing but love...

Anonymous said...

She's not belittled... she's little and fluffy!!! :)

Happy Birthday Darryl!

Anonymous said...

AWWWWWW I MISS ALLISON DELAMONT BRING HER BACK!!!!

Kat(i)e said...

Of course. As long as you love someone you can call them whatever you like! Ah well, us "chicks" do like it really... Here ends the feminist rant :-P