I've been thinking lately about God as our Father. I'm teaching at one of our church groups next week, and this has been on my mind, so that's what I'll talk about.
But you get a sneak preview while I find my way through.
The first thing I think of is that it's such a deep, rich analogy.
The second is, what if it's not an analogy?
Something C.S. Lewis talks about a lot (and Aristotle before him, but with different conclusions) is the way that the temporal often reflects the eternal... not because what we can't see right now is a shadow of what we can, but because what we have now is a shadow of what is to be.
I guess a good example of this is our desire to belong - to be part of an ethnic group, a nationality, a political party, a club, a church, or even a family. We want to be known, to be loved, to belong, and those are all good and natural longings. But we don't find their fulfillment in the here and now - to be deeply entrenched in the republican/demorcatic/green/whatever-Nader-is party will never begin to approach the kind of complete acceptance and "home" of being known and loved by our Creator. The means we have at our disposal now are temporary and inadequate, but the desire itself is much deeper, more permenant, and truer.
So here's the thing: becoming a father has changed me. What I know of love, of faith, of patience and care and hope are all worlds apart from what I knew before. And my understanding of how God relates to me and I to him has changed in very deep and dramatic ways, too.
But what if what I'm experiencing is not the final reality of what fatherhood is. What if this is the shadow - the analogy - and what my Father is to me is the reality.
What if?
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I just had a very interesting convo with a friend of this very thing...somewhat. She was telling me of a conference she was at with Steve Bell and he was saying a what if regarding the Trinity. What if the Trinity is actually an expression of complete and perfect relationship and therefore, creation merely born out of the need to express this perfect relationship. So what is the one thing that destroys relationship? Death. Therefore when Jesus died and rose again, he essentially overcame death thus conquering the one thing that destroys perfect complete relationship. And when you look at all of creation, all that we do, all the ways we destroy ourselves, is it possible to say that it comes out of the deep need to belong, to be connected to another human being?
I don't think God calls Himself "Father" to give us a picture of what he is like. I think the analogy is the other way around. We have fathers and (some of us) can be fathers so that we can understand how God is a Father to us. But all analogies are incomplete, so having and being a father can never fully explain the ideal relationship between us and God the Father.
That's why God uses lots of other analogies. There's the sheep/shepherd, husband, son, friend, etc. to try and give us a more complete picture.
I figure that our most important purpose on earth is to get to know God better and for him to build our character. There are probably so many things that God has instituted in our world that are meant to help us know Him more. But none of them can adequately describe how good it really is.
So to sum up, I think you are absolutely right. This life is a series of analogies (or shadows) of the reality that is to come.
Watching my sister's husband with their 2-month-old baby is wonderful... I think becoming a father has made Rob feel more "at home" than he's ever felt in his life. His confidence and peace are wonderful to watch - I think it's from being unconditionally loved and accepted by this helpless baby who looks like him, knows him, and shares his name... he and my sister were already really happy together, but this is a new level of Rob's being loved and accepted by God after a lifetime of hurt. It's profound stuff. Fatherhood is a mysterious, magnificently healing thing, from every angle.
Well, the talk went well last night, I think. And much of it went along these same lines... that while we can gain insight into some parts of God's fatherhood that would otherwise remain hidden to us by considering our own relationships, what we have is definitely a shadow of what he is. We didn't hit so much on the point of connection that you make, Nicole, but that's part of it... and, as you say, a somewhat mysterious part.
It was good. Good for me to think about, good for me to put forward for some others to think about, too.
Post a Comment